- Hillary looked like she was fighting for her life last night. It was not a position of strength, and I think it did little to quell fears about the central issue in this fight -- her electability.
- McCain secured a $4M loan from F&T Bank here in Bethesda, MD. If he used the federal matching funds as collateral, he can't withdraw from the matching funds program. The bank chairman says McCain did no such thing, offering instead as collateral "his long donor lists and his promise to raise it in the future."
A promise to repay or, better yet, to do your best to repay is not collateral. It is a promise implicit in the loan agreement. Collateral is, by its very nature, there in case you can't repay, despite your best efforts.
So, either the bank manager is lying - and the paperwork will show if that is the case - or it issued an unsecured loan. Either is bad. The first bad for the bank and will turn this into a scandal for the campaing; the second is just bad for the campaign, because the McCain-Feingold bill requires that loans to candidates be issued only where there is a reasonable assurance of payment. Nearly all loans have collateral, so I think anything less is not reasonable assurance. - And finally, if this means McCain only has $6M until September, his own campaign will cast in ironic relief the shortcomings of his campaign finance reform. If and when he runs out of cash, it will instead flow to the part (who will run 'Vote Republican' ads) and to 527s, who will attack the dems and urge Republican support. I don't think it will make a huge difference.
I aspire to be intelligent with moments of genius. So far, I have managed awkward with moments of competence.
2.27.2008
Political Tidbit
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I don't see why an "unsecured" loan would be any more problematic than any other business loan: McCain is basically negotiating a line of credit based on projected "earnings" or "donations" in the future - much like corporations have lines of credit which are based more on projected earnings than they are on assets. (c.f. startup companies, who get LoC based on future VC...).
thegameiam: You'd be right except that few business loans are provided without collateral, even if there is a promise of future earnings. You want to get a lien on the accounts recievable now and going forward. In a campaign. Things are different. It is not a going concern. Once you stop campaigning, you stop fundraising and the cash stops. It didn't stop here, but the bank didn't know that for sure.
Post a Comment